Новини
Evan McCallum
маркира кита като поръчан
маркира кита като поръчан
WWII German Sturmpanzer IV Brummbar Late Version Basic Tamiya
Voyager Model 1:35
PE35922 2017 Нова матрица 3 October, 01:52
Eyman Ahmed
притежава кита
притежава кита
Harrier GR Mk.7 `Royal Air Force´ [Royal Air Force Attacker]
Hasegawa 1:48
07236 (PT36) 2004 Нови части 3 October, 01:52
Fauzan R.
HA, Good one 🤣
HA, Good one 🤣
Kremlin Battleship Ship Ship Toys Assembled Model Toys Hobby
Louth Store 1:700
Unknown 2024 Нова матрица 3 October, 01:46
Todd McGaha
търси този кит
търси този кит
Regia Aeronautica Sicilia 1941 Decals
Print Scale 1:72
003-CAMO 3 October, 01:38
HawkEXO
притежава кита
притежава кита
Space Shuttle Orbiter & Boeing 747 "Shuttle Carrier Aircraft" Limited Edition
Hasegawa 1:200
10844 2021 Нова кутия Multi topic (2)3 October, 01:36
Gary Schurr
търси този кит
търси този кит
Vought RF-8G Crusader U.S. Navy Photo Reconnaissance Fighter VFP-306
ZDH Decals 1:72
72010 2024 Нова матрица 3 October, 01:20
HeavyShadow
притежава кита
притежава кита
Nakajima Ki-43 Oscar 19th Shibu-Tai; 20th, 50th, 64th & 248th Hiko-Sentai
SuperScale International 1:48
48-0516 (48-516) 3 October, 01:13
Antti K
добави нов фотоалбум.
добави нов фотоалбум.
19 5 August, 17:22
John Kristoffersen
Beautiful build! Recommend changing the positions of the AIM-9X with the AIM-120s. If you look at reference material, this loadout is "never" seen, due to wing flutter problems. It does not mean that you will find photos of this loadout, but it`s rare and mostly for loading/ off loading of weaponry. With a heavy load like this, wing flutter is not what you want as a driver 🙂
Beautiful build! Recommend changing the positions of the AIM-9X with the AIM-120s. If you look at reference material, this loadout is "never" seen, due to wing flutter problems. It does not mean that you will find photos of this loadout, but it`s rare and mostly for loading/ off loading of weaponry. With a heavy load like this, wing flutter is not what you want as a driver 🙂
6 August, 04:27
Antti K
Thanks for your comments 👍
I think I'll have to live with this 'what-if' weaponry configuration as all the missiles are firmly super glued in place.
Don't want to take a change of breaking something when detaching.
Thanks for your comments 👍
I think I'll have to live with this 'what-if' weaponry configuration as all the missiles are firmly super glued in place.
Don't want to take a change of breaking something when detaching.
7 August, 16:27
Tingo
I made an account to say this, but the Tip-RAAMs are correct. To my knowledge the Sidewinders were more "stable" under the wing and a lot of images you find of the F-16C has AMRAAMs on the tips, sidewinders on the outer pylon and any ordnance on the middle pylon, followed by fuel tanks on the inner wing pylon. Antti, you did a wonderful job, your ordnance layout is correct.
I made an account to say this, but the Tip-RAAMs are correct. To my knowledge the Sidewinders were more "stable" under the wing and a lot of images you find of the F-16C has AMRAAMs on the tips, sidewinders on the outer pylon and any ordnance on the middle pylon, followed by fuel tanks on the inner wing pylon. Antti, you did a wonderful job, your ordnance layout is correct.
3 October, 01:06
/bg/search.php?q=*&page=newsfeed&fkSECTION[]=Newsfeed
search-solr.php?lang=bg
35
35
/bg/search.php?q=*&page=newsfeed&fkSECTION[]=Newsfeed
35
todo