Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)
2 in 1 w/ interior
REVOSYS | Nr. RS-3001 | 1:35
Fakten
- Marke:
- REVOSYS
- Titel:
- Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
- Nummer:
- RS-3001
- Maßstab:
- 1:35
- Typ:
- Kompletter Bausatz
- Erschienen:
- 2017 Neue Bausatzform
- Barcode:
- 4897083250011 (EAN)
- Thema:
- VK 3601 » Panzer (Fahrzeuge)
Inhalt der Box
Spritzgußrahmen, Ätzteile, Decalbogen (Nassschiebebilder)
Maße:
380x240x90 mm
(15x9.4x3.5 inch)
Gewicht:
890 g (1.96 lbs)
Geschichte
REVOSYS
Rye Field Model
Bauanleitung
Herunterladen 12024Kb (.pdf)
Marktplatz
Onlineshops
AUD 91.50
USD 64.39Auf Lager »€ 56.90
USD 64.53Ausverkauft »€ 69.99
USD 79.37Ausverkauft ȴ 7120
USD 53.42Ausverkauft »zł 217.54
USD 57.95Ausverkauft »Privater Handel & Tausch
Alternative SKUs für REVOSYS RS-3001:
RS3001 | RVS3001 | 3001
Hinweis: Preise und Verfügbarkeit sind nur Richtwerte. Überprüfen Sie auch, ob das Produkt tatsächlich passt!
Verwandte Produkte
WWII German Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf.C/B VK36.01 Fenders REVOSYS
Voyager Model 1:35
PE35907 2018 Neue Bausatzform Bausatzvorstellungen
Externe Bewertungen
Werbung
Alle Bewertungen » (10 im Total)
Zeitschriften
Alle Zeitschriften » (4 im Total)
Kommentare
DONALD STEVENS
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
All comments (8) » 1 6 October 2018, 06:34
Trez Mackenzie
Expensive to shoot, no. Expensive to build? Yes. Expensive to maintain? Yes.
Expensive to shoot, no. Expensive to build? Yes. Expensive to maintain? Yes.
10 April, 23:25
beers
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
11 April, 02:11