Muro
Wall
zxcfgr
Nuevo álbum de fotos añadido
Nuevo álbum de fotos añadido
10 29 August, 16:27
Andy Taylor
I'm sorry to hear you had such a bad experience with this kit, but for balance, I've had none of the issues you mention. In fact it is going together beautifully. The instructions seem as clear as most to me and the roof of the landing gear bay fits perfectly well without removing those tabs, as long as you install it before the wing brace (as hinted in the instructions). I've also found the engine nacelles to fit very well indeed. I don't understand how you ended up with such large gaps as mine just dropped into place with no gap at all. Maybe you had a rogue kit, I don't know, but I'm really enjoying this build and would recommend it to anybody.
I'm sorry to hear you had such a bad experience with this kit, but for balance, I've had none of the issues you mention. In fact it is going together beautifully. The instructions seem as clear as most to me and the roof of the landing gear bay fits perfectly well without removing those tabs, as long as you install it before the wing brace (as hinted in the instructions). I've also found the engine nacelles to fit very well indeed. I don't understand how you ended up with such large gaps as mine just dropped into place with no gap at all. Maybe you had a rogue kit, I don't know, but I'm really enjoying this build and would recommend it to anybody.
26 October, 19:17
zxcfgr
I don't agree with what you said. In addition to the problems I have already raised, why didn't you mention the misalignment of the details after the upper and lower parts of the fuselage were installed? Do you dare to say that you didn't encounter it? There is also the problem of the hardness of the plastic. I don't believe that there was no breakage when you took the parts. You said you didn't encounter my problem? Can there be two sets of molds for a model? How can you recommend that fuselage detail to others? How can you say such irresponsible things? ! HK model's B17 and Lancaster are much better than this. This model can only match Tamiya's Type 1 land attack.
I don't agree with what you said. In addition to the problems I have already raised, why didn't you mention the misalignment of the details after the upper and lower parts of the fuselage were installed? Do you dare to say that you didn't encounter it? There is also the problem of the hardness of the plastic. I don't believe that there was no breakage when you took the parts. You said you didn't encounter my problem? Can there be two sets of molds for a model? How can you recommend that fuselage detail to others? How can you say such irresponsible things? ! HK model's B17 and Lancaster are much better than this. This model can only match Tamiya's Type 1 land attack.
27 October, 17:13
Andy Taylor
Wow, there's no need to be so rude buddy. You have your opinion of the kit and I have mine. I'll leave it at that.
Wow, there's no need to be so rude buddy. You have your opinion of the kit and I have mine. I'll leave it at that.
28 October, 22:18
August 30, 2024
August 29, 2024
wnolder.php?lang=es
2024-08-29 16:29:46
2024-08-29 16:21:18
145596
/ajax/wnolder.php?lang=es&sd=2024-08-29 16:29:46&md=2024-08-29 16:21:18&filter=&w=145596
todo