North American P-51D Mustang

Revell | No. H-619:50 | 1:72

Facts

Brand:: Revell
Title:: North American P-51D Mustang
Number:: H-619:50
Scale:: 1:72
Type:: Full kit
Released:: 1963 New box
Packaging:: Rigid box (Top opener)
Topic:: North American P-51 Mustang » Propeller (Aircraft)

Markings

North American P-51 Mustang

North American P-51D-15NA Mustang

US Army Air Forces (1941-1947)

343 FS, 55 FG, 8 AF CY-G | 44-15701 The Millie P (Maj. Edward B. Giller)
January 1945 Original (Incorrect) Colour Scheme - RAF Wormingford, Essex
FS11136 FS17178 FS13591 FS14255
343 FS, 55 FG, 8 AF CY-G | 44-15701 The Millie G (Maj. Edward B. Giller)
January 1945 World War 2»European Theatre - RAF Wormingford, Essex
FS34079 FS17178 FS27038 FS11136 FS13591 FS14110

Box contents

Plastic sprue, Decalsheet (waterslide)

Boxart designed by Brian Knight

Product timeline

Alanger

200x

New decals

Full history »

Marketplace

None of our partner shops or mates has this currently for sale.

Related products

P-51B/C Super Detailed Cockpit

Cutting Edge Modelworks 1:72

CEC72040 20xx New tool

P-51D Tail Antennas (steel)

Eduard 1:72

72742 2025* New tool

RAAF Five Inch Mustang Rockets

Red Roo Models 1:72

RRR72189 2024

North-American P-51D "USAAF Camouflaged P-51D Part 2"

LPS Hobby 1:72

LPM72-13 2014 New tool

Camouflage Mask Set

P-51D Mustang GA-S 112 sqn

TopNotch 1:72

TNM72-M087 2021 New tool

All related products » (156 in total)

In-box reviews

External reviews

We don't know about any in-box reviews for this North American P-51D Mustang (#H-619:50) from Revell.

Comments

Stilicho
Aren't there duplicate entries here?

All comments (9) » 18 June 2015, 09:40

Stilicho
hat's what I said. "So they are " different . I was not being sarcastic. I didn't think I was imprecise. It was just a superficial observation in passing. All is well. Peace ,brother.

18 June 2015, 21:32

Rex
Sorry, "so they are" could mean that you are agreeing with Gunther, or it could mean that you were repeating your original post. (you only thought the word "different", you didn't type it)

I figured that you were still on the path of combining kits when they shouldn't be,,,,,you have to admit that is where you have been for a while now on here.

But, yes, add that word "different" in there, and you are 100% correct.

(Rex, the stupid "Moh-reen" that can only read what is typed)

18 June 2015, 22:00