Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)
2 in 1 w/ interior
REVOSYS | No. RS-3001 | 1:35
![Boxart Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) RS-3001 REVOSYS Boxart Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) RS-3001 REVOSYS](/products/img/4/9/4/963494-16882-82-720.jpg)
Facts
- Brand:
- REVOSYS
- Title:
- Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
- Number:
- RS-3001
- Scale:
- 1:35
- Type:
- Full kit
- Released:
- 2017 New tool
- Barcode:
- 4897083250011 (EAN)
- Topic:
- VK 3601 » Tanks (Vehicles)
Box contents
Plastic sprue, Photoetched fret, Decalsheet (waterslide)
Dimensions:
380x240x90 mm
(15x9.4x3.5 inch)
Weight:
890 g (1.96 lbs)
Product timeline
Full history »Instructions
Download 12024Kb (.pdf)
Marketplace
Online shops
![Order now at BNA Model World Logo BNA Model World](/shops/img/1387-p.jpg)
AUD 91.50
![AU AU](/s/images/flags7/32/AU.png)
![Order now at AIRDESIGN.SK Logo AIRDESIGN.SK](/shops/img/2123-10000-p.jpg)
€ 56.90
![SK SK](/s/images/flags7/32/SK.png)
![Order now at Robotines Logo Robotines](/shops/img/2518-10000-96-p.jpg)
€ 69.99
![ES ES](/s/images/flags7/32/ES.png)
![Order now at HobbyLink Japan Logo HobbyLink Japan](/shops/img/69-21096-26-p.jpg)
¥ 7120
![JP JP](/s/images/flags7/32/JP.png)
![Order now at Plastmodel Logo Plastmodel](/shops/img/2508-21285-72-p.jpg)
zł 217.54
![PL PL](/s/images/flags7/32/PL.png)
Private trade & swap
Alternative SKUs for REVOSYS RS-3001:
RS3001 | RVS3001 | 3001
Note: Prices and availability are indications only. Also check if the product actually matches!
Related products
In-box reviews
External reviews
Advertisement
All reviews » (10 in total)
Magazines
All magazines » (4 in total)
Comments
![](/profiles/img/43402-702-s.jpg)
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
All comments (8) » 1 6 October 2018, 06:34
![](/profiles/img/132974-828-s.jpg)
Expensive to shoot, no. Expensive to build? Yes. Expensive to maintain? Yes.
10 April, 23:25
![](/profiles/img/user-s.jpg)
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
11 April, 02:11