Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)
2 in 1 w/ interior
REVOSYS | Nr. RS-3001 | 1:35
Feiten
- Merk:
- REVOSYS
- Titel:
- Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
- Nummer:
- RS-3001
- Schaal:
- 1:35
- Type:
- Volledig model
- Uitgegeven:
- 2017 Nieuwe mallen
- Barcode:
- 4897083250011 (EAN)
- Onderwerp:
- VK 3601 » Tanks (Voertuigen)
Inhoud van de doos
Plastic Gietraam, Raam met ge-etste delen, Vel met natte transfers
Afmetingen:
380x240x90 mm
(15x9.4x3.5 inch)
Gewicht:
890 g (1.96 lbs)
Product tijdlijn
REVOSYS
Rye Field Model
Handleidingen
Download 12024Kb (.pdf)
Marktplaats
Online winkels
AUD 91.50
USD 63.45Op voorraad »€ 56.90
USD 64.45Uitverkocht »€ 69.99
USD 79.27Uitverkocht ȴ 7120
USD 53.52Uitverkocht »zł 217.54
USD 57.48Uitverkocht »Particuliere handel & ruilen
Alternatieve SKU's voor REVOSYS RS-3001:
RS3001 | RVS3001 | 3001
Notitie: Prijzen en beschikbaarheid alleen ter indicatie, controleer of het product daadwerkelijk overeenkomt.
Verwante producten
WWII German Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf.C/B VK36.01 Fenders REVOSYS
Voyager Model 1:35
PE35907 2018 Nieuwe mallen In-box reviews
Externe reviews
Advertentie
Alle reviews » (10 in totaal)
Tijdschriften
Alle tijdschriften » (4 in totaal)
Opmerkingen
DONALD STEVENS
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
All comments (8) » 1 6 October 2018, 06:34
Trez Mackenzie
Expensive to shoot, no. Expensive to build? Yes. Expensive to maintain? Yes.
Expensive to shoot, no. Expensive to build? Yes. Expensive to maintain? Yes.
10 April, 23:25
beers
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
11 April, 02:11