Spitfire Mk.Vb (HobbyBoss)

1
July 22, 2024
I don't quite understand which of the two camouflage options is the right one for this aircraft.
2
July 22, 2024
It looks like they "forgot" to make wheel fairing doors for the landing gear. I had to make them myself.
3
July 25, 2024
Primer is applied
4
July 28, 2024
Chocolate Spitfire. 🙂 I chose a pre-august-1941 camouflage pattern.
5
July 29, 2024
The test result of the five-dollar airbrush
6
July 30, 2024
Painted various small parts. Ready to apply glossy varnish.
7
July 31, 2024
Mates, I completely forgot to ask: What is it on the wings? I didn't find the answer in my drawings. Perhaps retractable headlights?
8
July 31, 2024
I have no idea what these landing lights looked like in reality, so I depicted them on the model as such.
9
August 1, 2024
Glossy varnish and decals are applied
10
August 2, 2024
It remains to finish a few minor details.
11
August 2, 2024
12
August 2, 2024
13
August 2, 2024
The Spitfire is finished
14
August 2, 2024
15
August 2, 2024

Kommentarer

22 22 July, 16:19

komoras
HobbyBoss painting schemes are suggestive at best, so to say...
Having them suggesting RLM66 on Luftwaffe camouflage, where the RLM75 should go...it's enough for me to look elsewhere.
Go with the other sources on the internet, I would suggest looking up more multiple sources.
And as far my RAF knowledge goes, after the Battle of Britain this camo combo was not used anymore, but I might be wrong.

PS. "Oark earth" shoudl say enoguh... 😄

22 July, 16:51

Duster_d
Komoras, I can assume that they (HB) were guided by this: airliners.net/photo/..9-Spitfire/0843874/L

22 July, 17:16

komoras
soyuyo.main.jp/spit5b/spit5be-1.html

I think this one sums it up best 🙂
Both is correct, depends only which one you want to represent - pre-august 1941 or post-august 1941.
(Thus concluding, my BoB related comment is wrong) 🙂

22 July, 17:33

Nicolas
I'll take a seat.

25 July, 17:38

Alex K
Me too...

25 July, 19:48

Łukasz Gliński
Interesting, couldn't find any trace of DE/DG on Polish Mk Vs.
I know of Mk Is and IIs being repainted in Polish squadrons, but I'd assume this one has been repainted into DG/DG before being delivered to the 317th.
Still, there's no proof.
Very cool to see you added the undercarriage covers, what a silly mistake by HB 😄

29 July, 20:25

Duster_d
Łukasz, I was guided by these photos. If the guys from Duxford had painted a real Spitfire like that, then why can't I paint a model in such a scheme? 🙂
airliners.net/photo/..tfire-LF5B/7392151/L

30 July, 02:19

Łukasz Gliński
Sure you can 🙂 Keep it up 👍

30 July, 11:22

Hans-Jürgen Haag
Looks good so far! The boxes under the Wings could be the cameraports for the later PR variants with no big gunns.
I would cut it.

31 July, 07:15

Łukasz Gliński
Agree w/Hans-Jürgen - checked my 3 completed Spitfires (Mk I & V by Airfix and old KP Mk IX) and none of them sports such a feature

31 July, 08:36

Duster_d
Guys, it looks like these are retractable landing lights after all. They were installed until 1942.

I have no idea why HB made them in the lower position. 🙂

[img1]
[img2]

31 July, 13:27

Łukasz Gliński
Great catch!
[img1]

31 July, 14:26

Duster_d
Łukasz, it seems that only Chinese manufacturers have paid attention to this feature in early (Mk.V and older) Spitfires. 🙂

31 July, 14:44

Hans-Jürgen Haag
Extended landinglight!👍👍👍😅

31 July, 15:19

Mr D
It's a nice tidy job and correct, there were many paint finishes on them.
HB are great little kits for the money, but have few shortcomings.
Always good to do bit of research before n around a build...it's interesting n helps with accuracy.
Top job 👍👍👍

1 August, 17:54

Duster_d
Mr D, yes, exactly. In the process of building, you constantly learn something new, and that's what attracts me to this hobby. What isn't always visible in drawings or 3D models can be discovered when assembling a kit. Each assembled kit teaches me something new about its real prototype, and it's so exciting!

1 August, 18:18