News Feed

Chan Li
Beautiful result.

Spanjaard
Beautiful result indeed. Great paintjob!

Arif Saeed
Thank you very much Chan and Spanjaard 👍

Robin (WhiteGlint)
I may repeat the others but beautiful is quite fitting. 👍
Kind of flew under my radar.
Very nice work, Arif.

James C
Thats a nice looking Fulcrum Arif 👍
I've got the Acadamy single and 2 seater versions in 1/48 scale in the stash, but have read that it's a bit of a dog of a kit so may sell them in favor of obtaining a better quality single seater.

Arif Saeed
Thanks for the very kind words WhiteGlint/James much appreciated 👍

Eric Thornton
👍 Awesome! I hope to make a Peruvian MiG-29 someday. How was this kit? Did it got together well?

Neuling
Very good looking paint work with subtle shading and weathering!

Vincent
Great work on the shading and camo scheme.

Arif Saeed
Thanks very much Eric, Neuling and Vincent 👍
Eric the kit is quite good, I only wish GWH did one piece intakes as the fitting is not great, the armaments and launch rail fitting is also problematic with missing pegs, apart from that it's a nice build

Juskifo
Arif it's a good job, I take the eyes of it Congratulations to you

Arif Saeed
Thanks Juskifo 👍

Neil
Fantastic work!

Arif Saeed
Neil, thanks for the kind words mate 👍

Mr James
Great looking model with great shading and weathering. Lovely work

Arif Saeed
Thanks Mr James, much appreciated 👍

CaptGPF
Agree with Mr James and Neuling

FernandoCouto
MENG lost much fame on their KT and Panther tanks. They truly provided a full set of interior, with a hull with incorrect dimensions ( too long IMHO) and too "erected" suspension bogeys, make it looks taller. Some modellers complained about poor plastic (especially the dark red release) even turned their cement red.
Despite more than 12,000 sets ordered even before released, it's just a kit with reasonable price.
Look at the link-and-length tracks, would you tell the parts as "tracks" before they are attached to running wheels?
Well, there is a movable individual track and "torsion bar" sets sold separately, price nearly equals a tank.

Trez Mackenzie
Perhaps there were some small issues - but there are also some good points. No kit is perfect and some require more work than others. Most modellers like to tinker about to add their own mark and make any corrections found by research. The more experienced you become the less likely 'OOB' builds
As for tracks - don't make me laugh! Most Modellers (not me) spend a fortune on metal tracks and lazy AM stuff.

Ps my apologies for the harsh initial post - no disrespect meant

This kit has been popular, the interior makes the Trumpeter 1/16 one look a joke (which was one of the reasons for the interior set), has a metal barrel and will build into a fine rendition of the real thing

You can look at a few of my attempts at builds - a few cheap kits were just test beds to get my skills up as I spent about 3 decades away

I always scratch were necessary after I read up on the subject. Today there is too much reliance on AM and metal tracks

FernandoCouto
It's worth the price. But not a nice kit. MENG "referred" 1/16 Trumpeter kit during research.
However the process was a mess.
If we talk too much about MENG that's off the topic.
Back to the kit, they did not intend to release a best kit, they wanted a best sold one.
You can build a full interior KT, that's the fact.
Well, tracks are another story...Too many inaccurate and expensive aftermarket sets from Chinese brands...

Trez Mackenzie
I don't mind talking about any brand - if there's time - that's why we're here. I have a few MENG kits in my stash so always like to get different views.
Of course nowadays everything is political - the reviews are mostly biased because many companies send out free kits so you rarely get the truth.
My view is it is just about telling a story - some words are left out or changed but it takes nothing away from the story.

I try to use good references and go from there