modellbau datenbank | stash-manager

Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

Academy/Minicraft | Nr. 1655 | 1:72

Boxart Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk 1655 Academy/Minicraft

Fakten

Marke:
Academy/Minicraft
Titel:
Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk
Nummer:
1655
Maßstab:
1:72
Typ:
Kompletter Bausatz
Erschienen:
1987 Neue Verpackung
Barcode:
048051016557 (EAN: 0048051016557)
Verpackung:
Feste Box (Stülpschachtel)
Thema:
Curtiss P-40 Warhawk » Propeller (Flugzeuge)

Markierungen

Curtiss P-40 Warhawk

Curtiss Hawk 81 A-2
TW 中華民國空軍 (Republic of China Air Force 1920-now)

Inhalt der Box

Spritzgußrahmen (Clear), Spritzgußrahmen, Decalbogen (Nassschiebebilder)

Maße:
190x125x40 mm (7.5x4.9x1.6 inch)

Geschichte

 
Academy
 
Academy/Minicraft
Sunny
Modelist
Premium Hobbies
Gesamte Historie »

Bauanleitung

Herunterladen 2626Kb (.pdf)

Marktplatz

Alternative SKUs für Academy/Minicraft 1655:

Hinweis: Preise und Verfügbarkeit sind nur Richtwerte. Überprüfen Sie auch, ob das Produkt tatsächlich passt!

Verwandte Produkte

AC-7254
Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk Academy, Frog etc
Airwaves 1:72
AC-7254 200x Neue Bausatzform
C.015
I. P-40C Tomahawk / II. P-40E/F Warhawk Cockpit Placards
AIRKIT 1:72
C.015 198x Neue Bausatzform
72001
P-40B/E
TEXHOCET 1:72
72001 19xx Neue Bausatzform Mehrfachthemen (1!!)
Q72210
P-40B/C Exhausts
CMK (Czech Master Kits) 1:72
Q72210 2014 Neue Bausatzform
D72035
Captured Fighters in Finnish Service WW II
SBS Model 1:72
D72035 2020 Neue Bausatzform Mehrfachthemen (3)

Alle verwandten Produkte » (121 im Total)

Bausatzvorstellungen

Externe Bewertungen
Modelingmadness
In-Box-Überprüfung
Modelingmadness

Projekte

10 Bilder
Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk View album, image #1
1:72
1:72 Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk (Academy/Minicraft 1655)

Kommentare

Juan M Leria
What do we do with this kind of kits?
Much has beed said about the relation of Academy toolings with other brands (this and the Frog one, the MiG-23 and F-104 to Hasegawa, P-39 and Tempest to Heller...), but it is more a matter of copying than retooling; you can't mix those tools without major or minor surgery.
Should we establish that relationship as 'based on ..' or we consider it 'new tool'?
21 October 2012, 09:19
Burkhard D
I propose a new origin entry 're-tool' to go along with 'rebox' including reference to the new tool it is based on.

We shouldn't bother whether we have a case of legal re-tooling or a not so legal copying. If we'd do, it would pose a legal risk to Tim as the owner of the site.
21 October 2012, 10:30
Juan M Leria
That's right. This is one of this cases. It was said this was a copy, but not a 're-tool' as the company hadn't access to the original tool and the parts layout is quite different.
The matter with the F4F is much more obvious and maybe the origin of these believings, it has even the same support stand!
Maybe we should had an entry of 'It is said is a re-tool based on...'
But I think we shouldn't mention it anyway.
21 October 2012, 11:26
Burkhard D
How about 're-engineered' then? Sounds like a nice euphemism to me :-D
21 October 2012, 11:35
scalemates
for me it is a "new tool".... adding the other one will make it more complex... there is currently already a mixing up of "rebox" and "new tool"...
21 October 2012, 16:26

Referenzmaterial

Curtiss P-40 B/C Warhawk (Kagero 25007)
Curtiss P-40 B/C Warhawk
REFERENCES Nr. 25007
2024
P-40 Tomahawk and Kittyhawk (Wing Leader 24)
P-40 Tomahawk and Kittyhawk In RAF Service - Europe and North Africa
Wingleader Photo Archive Nr. 24
Neil Robinson
2023

Alle Bücher » (82 im Total) Alle Walkarounds » (23 im Total)