Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

Academy/Minicraft | No. 1655 | 1:72

Fatos

Marca:

Academy/Minicraft

Título:

Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

Número:

1655

Escala:

1:72

Tipo:

Kit completo

Lançado:

1987 Nova caixa

Código de barras:

048051016557 (EAN: 0048051016557)

Embalagem:

Caixa rígida (abertura pelo topo)

Tópico:

Curtiss P-40 Warhawk » Hélice (Aeronave)

Marcações

Curtiss P-40 Warhawk

Curtiss Hawk 81 A-2

中華民國空軍 (Republic of China Air Force 1920-now)

• American Volunteer Group, 3 PS Hell's Angels 68 | P-8109 (Charles Older)
  1942 World War 2 - Kunming
  FS34079 FS30219 FS36463

Conteúdo

Árvore de plástico, Árvore de plástico (Clear), Decalque (dágua)

Linha do tempo do produto

 

Academy

Academy/Minicraft

Sunny

Premium Hobbies

1987

 

1989

1996

199x

2014

202x

 

Produto novoNova caixaNova caixaNova caixaNova caixaNova caixaNova caixaRebox

Instruções

Download 2626Kb (.pdf)

Mercado

SKUs alternativos para Academy/Minicraft 1655:

Nota: Preços e disponibilidade são apenas indicações. Verifique se o produto realmente corresponde à entrada!

Produtos relacionados

Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk Academy, Frog etc

Airwaves 1:72

AC-7254 200x Produto novo

I. P-40C Tomahawk / II. P-40E/F Warhawk Cockpit Placards

AIRKIT 1:72

C.015 198x Produto novo

P-40B/E

TEXHOCET 1:72

72001 19xx Produto novo Tópico múltiplo (1!!)

P-40B/C Exhausts

CMK (Czech Master Kits) 1:72

Q72210 2014 Produto novo

Captured Fighters in Finnish Service WW II

SBS Model 1:72

D72035 2020 Produto novo Tópico múltiplo (3)

Todos os produtos relacionados » (121 no total)

Avaliações

Revisões externas

Avaliação da caixa

Modelingmadness

Projetos

10 imagens

Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

1:72

Projeto: Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

Comentários

Juan M Leria
What do we do with this kind of kits?
Much has beed said about the relation of Academy toolings with other brands (this and the Frog one, the MiG-23 and F-104 to Hasegawa, P-39 and Tempest to Heller...), but it is more a matter of copying than retooling; you can't mix those tools without major or minor surgery.
Should we establish that relationship as 'based on ..' or we consider it 'new tool'?

21 October 2012, 09:19

Burkhard D
I propose a new origin entry 're-tool' to go along with 'rebox' including reference to the new tool it is based on.

We shouldn't bother whether we have a case of legal re-tooling or a not so legal copying. If we'd do, it would pose a legal risk to Tim as the owner of the site.

21 October 2012, 10:30

Juan M Leria
That's right. This is one of this cases. It was said this was a copy, but not a 're-tool' as the company hadn't access to the original tool and the parts layout is quite different.
The matter with the F4F is much more obvious and maybe the origin of these believings, it has even the same support stand!
Maybe we should had an entry of 'It is said is a re-tool based on...'
But I think we shouldn't mention it anyway.

21 October 2012, 11:26

Burkhard D
How about 're-engineered' then? Sounds like a nice euphemism to me :-D

21 October 2012, 11:35

scalemates
for me it is a "new tool".... adding the other one will make it more complex... there is currently already a mixing up of "rebox" and "new tool"...

21 October 2012, 16:26

Material de referência

Curtiss P-40 B/C Warhawk

REFERENCES No. 25007

2024

P-40 Tomahawk and Kittyhawk In RAF Service - Europe and North Africa

Wingleader Photo Archive No. 24

Neil Robinson

2023

Todos os livros » (82 no total) Todos os <em>walkarounds</em> » (24 no total)